Alsatian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,292,177 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 27.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $36,475, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $82,193, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $44,763, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.9%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.26%), 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%).