Israeli vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Israeli
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Israelis
Chickasaw
6,737
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
145th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Israeli Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,734,325 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.660% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 659.8 Chickasaw.
Israeli vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $36,475, a difference of 44.2%), median family income ($118,577 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $82,193, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $44,763, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.0%).
Income Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,596 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,577 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,552 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $52,937 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,228 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,852 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Average $52,335 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,579 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,186 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,636 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 32.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.6%).
Poverty Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 36.3% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 106.3%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.3% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Israeli vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 65.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%).
Disability Metric | Israeli | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |