European vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,182,945 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,367 compared to $82,193, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($88,751 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($108,099 compared to $85,356, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($39,457 compared to $34,414, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.81%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 43.5%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.4%).