Asian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,508,664 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $70,005, a difference of 45.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $77,929, a difference of 44.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $82,193, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.86%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $44,763, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $53,732, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 56.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 35.5%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.9%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.3%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%).