Taiwanese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,341,244 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.508% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 507.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $77,929, a difference of 30.2%), median household income ($89,900 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.4%), and per capita income ($46,455 compared to $36,475, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $44,763, a difference of 11.3%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $47,832, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 50.6%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.1%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.0%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.36%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.5%).