Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chickasaw
5,686
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
171st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Eastern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,827,429 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.775. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,299 compared to $70,005, a difference of 20.4%), per capita income ($43,838 compared to $36,475, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($102,451 compared to $85,356, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,838 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,451 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $84,299 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,969 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,713 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,644 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,158 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,458 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,467 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,157 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.6%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.2%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.8%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 23.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.1%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 43.1%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 67.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |