Kiowa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,864,091 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 29.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $82,193, a difference of 9.9%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $70,005, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $44,763, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $40,672, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 51.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 18.9%), married-couple households (42.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.0%), associate's degree (36.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and male disability (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.0%).