Immigrants from Croatia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,371,393 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.500% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 500.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,503 compared to $77,929, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 39.6%), and single female poverty (18.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.23%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 51.3%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.5%).