Jamaican vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Jamaican
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Jamaicans
Chickasaw
821
SOCIAL INDEX
5.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
337th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Jamaican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,823,990 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Chickasaw.
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.8%), and median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($48,632 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($90,581 compared to $85,356, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,231 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,581 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,583 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,343 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,632 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,670 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,929 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,933 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,327 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,560 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.4% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and currently married (41.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.29%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 128.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 60.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 45.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.8%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.050%), ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%).
Disability Metric | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |