Seminole vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Seminole
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Seminole
Chickasaw
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Seminole Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,225,045 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 281.0 Chickasaw.
Seminole vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $82,193, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,373 compared to $53,732, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($36,180 compared to $36,475, a difference of 0.81%), and median household income ($69,420 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.84%).
Income Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,180 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,354 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,420 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,233 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,783 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,385 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,649 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,584 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,077 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,373 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (35.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (80.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Labor Participation Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Seminole vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Disability Metric | Seminole | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |