Seminole vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Seminole

Chickasaw

Poor
Fair
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Seminole Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,225,045 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 281.0 Chickasaw.
Seminole Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Seminole vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $82,193, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,373 compared to $53,732, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($36,180 compared to $36,475, a difference of 0.81%), and median household income ($69,420 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.84%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricSeminoleChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,180
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,354
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,420
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,783
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,385
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,649
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,584
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,077
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,373
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.6%
Tragic
27.2%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (35.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricSeminoleChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.8%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSeminoleChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (80.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSeminoleChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Tragic
79.0%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSeminoleChickasaw
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.0%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSeminoleChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.4%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricSeminoleChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Seminole vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Seminole vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricSeminoleChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.9%