Barbadian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,663,451 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 356.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 43.3%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $44,763, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.80%), median male earnings ($51,236 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $82,193, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 37.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 34.7%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (62.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 232.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 90.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 53.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 76.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.3%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 77.9%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 67.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.6%).