Dominican vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Dominicans

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Dominican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,202,819 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Dominican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dominicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dominicans corresponds to an increase of 26.8 Chickasaw.
Dominican Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Dominican vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.9%), householder income over 65 years ($46,964 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $44,763, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,204 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.3%), median household income ($71,302 compared to $70,005, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,623 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.9%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricDominicanChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,697
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,888
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,302
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,864
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,204
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,046
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,633
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,229
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,623
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$46,964
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
27.2%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 67.0%), and receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricDominicanChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
13.1%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDominicanChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.5%
Good
5.4%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDominicanChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple households (38.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and currently married (39.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.7%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDominicanChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 274.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 111.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 67.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 97.8%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDominicanChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 89.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricDominicanChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.5%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Dominican vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Dominican vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricDominicanChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.9%