Immigrants from Panama vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,959,010 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 127.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.0%), median household income ($80,873 compared to $70,005, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $77,929, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $53,732, a difference of 6.0%), median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.6%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $40,672, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.66%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.1%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (88.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.2%).