Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Chickasaw
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,260,107 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 84.2 Chickasaw.
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $77,929, a difference of 25.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.1%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,832, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 71.1%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 122.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 81.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.060%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |