Kenyan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,240,319 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Kenyan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.638. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kenyans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kenyans corresponds to an increase of 188.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,970 compared to $82,193, a difference of 20.4%), median household income ($84,085 compared to $70,005, a difference of 20.1%), and median family income ($101,417 compared to $85,356, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.1%), median male earnings ($53,647 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,514 compared to $53,732, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.1%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.83%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kenyan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%).