Italian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,111 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $82,193, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $77,929, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($92,475 compared to $70,005, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.7%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.7%).