Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,061,156 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to a decrease of 17.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $77,929, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($95,737 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $53,732, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 45.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.1%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 82.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 74.4%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.8%).