Immigrants from Iran vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,200,312 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $36,475, a difference of 58.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($126,940 compared to $82,193, a difference of 54.4%), and median household income ($108,055 compared to $70,005, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.8%), and median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $34,414, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 66.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 57.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 51.5%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 117.9%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 100.5%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 89.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 89.7%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 78.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.9%).