Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,617,753 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 25.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 40.6%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $53,732, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($51,446 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $85,356, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.91%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 202.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 63.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.3%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 79.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%).