Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chickasaw
2,310
SOCIAL INDEX
20.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
263rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Nigeria Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,596,258 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 41.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.6%), median household income ($81,236 compared to $70,005, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,804 compared to $82,193, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,339 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,439 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,236 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,030 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,310 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,294 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,174 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $86,589 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,804 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $58,942 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.3%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.42%), ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and high school diploma (87.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 74.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |