Shoshone vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,067,052 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $44,763, a difference of 8.8%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,062 compared to $77,929, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.21%), and median earnings ($40,932 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and female poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.4%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.92%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.1%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.4%).