New Zealander vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,993,992 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 136.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.7%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $70,005, a difference of 35.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $82,193, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $34,414, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.9%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.8%).