Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,500,772 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.990. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Chickasaw.
Yup'ik Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $47,832, a difference of 21.1%), and per capita income ($30,518 compared to $36,475, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($69,695 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,000 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($32,730 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.1%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricYup'ikChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 149.5%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 131.2%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.4%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Tragic
13.1%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (16.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 217.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 197.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 193.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 100.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 105.2%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Good
5.4%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Tragic
79.0%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 95.6%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (72.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (39.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 16.8%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Tragic
36.3%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 484.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 68.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 57.9%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.4%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 56.6%), associate's degree (25.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.7%), and no schooling completed (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 160.0%), ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and self-care disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.8%).
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.9%