Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,846,406 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.1%), per capita income ($44,552 compared to $36,475, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $77,929, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.45%), median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($46,094 compared to $40,672, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.1%), and single female poverty (18.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 97.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 130.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 79.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (54.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.0%).