Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Belize
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Belize

Chickasaw

Tragic
Fair
1,058
SOCIAL INDEX
8.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
323rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Belize Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,602,561 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to an increase of 104.6 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Belize Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 27.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.4%), and median household income ($75,938 compared to $70,005, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,809 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.050%), householder income over 65 years ($53,665 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.13%), and median earnings ($42,339 compared to $40,672, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,614
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,197
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,938
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,339
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,809
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,056
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,223
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,141
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,229
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,665
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.3%), currently married (41.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.3%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
49.9%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 81.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (32.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.5%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.1%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Belize vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BelizeChickasaw
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.6%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%