Scottish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,442,033 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.609. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.194% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 193.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $82,193, a difference of 24.2%), median family income ($104,288 compared to $85,356, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($44,440 compared to $36,475, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.5%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.5%).