Estonian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,113,439 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.300% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 300.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,875 compared to $36,475, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,220 compared to $82,193, a difference of 39.0%), and median family income ($118,013 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($43,106 compared to $34,414, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 47.3%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.18%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.6%).