Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Chickasaw
991
SOCIAL INDEX
7.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
328th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Hispanic or Latino Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,735,024 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Chickasaw.
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.3%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and median household income ($73,823 compared to $70,005, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,421 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($85,647 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.34%), and median earnings ($40,288 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.95%).
Income Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,688 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,647 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,823 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,288 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,419 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,421 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,279 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,515 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,006 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,832 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 35.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.39%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.4% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.19, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.4% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.1% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.80%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and high school diploma (82.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hispanic or Latino vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Hispanic or Latino | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |