Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,854,146 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.822. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 156.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($83,968 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,987 compared to $77,929, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.6%), median earnings ($45,468 compared to $40,672, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 182.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 54.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.7%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 2nd grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.2%).