Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,680,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 238.1 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $36,475, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $82,193, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $77,929, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $34,414, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,893 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,392 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,091 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,741 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,220 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,771 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,638 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,089 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,175 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,620 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.7%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.3%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.46%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.3%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.5%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |