Romanian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,015,266 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 45.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $36,475, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $77,929, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $53,732, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single female poverty (19.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.23%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.2%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.9%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.5%).