Egyptian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,929,997 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 37.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,673 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,256 compared to $82,193, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $77,929, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%).