British West Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,274,119 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 50.8%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $34,414, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,636 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $82,193, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($88,987 compared to $85,356, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.9%), and receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.8%), male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 31.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.1%), married-couple households (38.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.2%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 278.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 115.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 31.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 66.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 94.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 84.2%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 75.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.1%).