Moroccan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Moroccans

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Moroccan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,209,086 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 89.6 Chickasaw.
Moroccan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,854 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.7%), median household income ($86,468 compared to $70,005, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,117 compared to $77,929, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $47,832, a difference of 18.1%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricMoroccanChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,854
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Good
$104,488
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Good
$86,468
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,838
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,499
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,872
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,256
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,117
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,138
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,683
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.2%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.6%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricMoroccanChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.1%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMoroccanChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMoroccanChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), family households (61.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMoroccanChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.22
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.8%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMoroccanChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 47.3%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricMoroccanChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Moroccan vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.3%).
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricMoroccanChickasaw
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%