Tongan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tongan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tongans
Chickasaw
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Tongan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,585,586 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Chickasaw.
Tongan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,076 compared to $70,005, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $47,832, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.3%).
Income Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,693 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,967 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,076 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,665 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,218 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,288 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,972 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,604 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,643 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,235 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 56.1%), single father poverty (12.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.2%).
Poverty Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.4% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (69.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 63.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and bachelor's degree (34.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Education Level Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.9%).
Disability Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |