Native Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,769,847 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $53,732, a difference of 32.2%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $40,672, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 13.2%), associate's degree (43.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.0%).