Pueblo vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pueblo
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pueblo
Chickasaw
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Pueblo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,533,075 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Chickasaw.
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($41,314 compared to $47,832, a difference of 15.8%), and per capita income ($32,012 compared to $36,475, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $44,763, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.7%).
Income Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,012 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,880 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $64,692 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,859 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,314 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $32,564 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,018 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $68,910 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,601 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,930 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 92.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 60.8%), and family poverty (17.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (28.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.2% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.4% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 47.9%), currently married (38.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.79 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 38.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 53.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.80%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and hearing disability (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Disability Metric | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.9% |