Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,279,543 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 55.5 Chickasaw.
Potawatomi Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $77,929, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($38,046 compared to $36,475, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $44,763, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($41,288 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.5%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother poverty (34.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.4%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
36.3%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%