Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cameroon
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cameroon
Chickasaw
4,741
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
194th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Cameroon Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,787,252 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Cameroon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cameroon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.332% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cameroon corresponds to an increase of 332.0 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.6%), median household income ($85,314 compared to $70,005, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,084 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,119 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,214 compared to $77,929, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($41,334 compared to $36,475, a difference of 13.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,334 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,289 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,314 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,329 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $52,119 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,354 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,433 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,214 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,084 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,907 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 41.3%), single female poverty (19.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (29.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.4%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Cameroon vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cameroon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cameroon | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |