Russian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,301,913 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 39.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $36,475, a difference of 45.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $77,929, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $82,193, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $53,732, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 47.9%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 88.4%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 71.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.8%).