Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
5,294
SOCIAL INDEX
50.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
181st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Peru Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,353,281 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.744. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 70.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,010 compared to $70,005, a difference of 27.2%), householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $44,763, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.2%), median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $47,832, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,852 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,534 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,010 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,025 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,695 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,871 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,384 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,329 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,173 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,988 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 45.1%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 41.3%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.44%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.90%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |