Macedonian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Macedonian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Macedonians
Chickasaw
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Macedonian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,295,096 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Macedonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Macedonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Macedonians corresponds to an increase of 56.7 Chickasaw.
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,882 compared to $77,929, a difference of 30.7%), per capita income ($47,573 compared to $36,475, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,074 compared to $82,193, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,564 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($41,286 compared to $34,414, a difference of 20.0%).
Income Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,573 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,668 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,761 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,893 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,522 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,286 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,563 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,882 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,074 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,564 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.5%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and single female poverty (18.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.5%).
Poverty Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Unemployment Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.2%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and bachelor's degree (41.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Macedonian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Macedonian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%).
Disability Metric | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |