Indian (Asian) vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,584,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $77,929, a difference of 53.3%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $70,005, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $82,193, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $44,763, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $53,732, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 62.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 52.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.4%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 94.0%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 79.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 82.0%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.2%).