Immigrants from Portugal vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,685,322 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.6%), median household income ($84,740 compared to $70,005, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $53,732, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $47,832, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 47.9%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.18%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.5%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and bachelor's degree (32.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.5%).