Swedish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,116,530 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 6.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $82,193, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $85,356, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $34,414, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $53,732, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 52.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.6%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.1%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.1%).