Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,735,999 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 163.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $36,475, a difference of 33.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $82,193, a difference of 30.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,727 compared to $77,929, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 38.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 72.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.3%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.7%).