Iraqi vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,372,642 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Iraqi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iraqis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iraqis corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,387 compared to $82,193, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($83,753 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($100,658 compared to $85,356, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($38,666 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,466 compared to $53,732, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and 9th grade (94.9% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (48.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.4%).