Thai vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,409,218 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($110,648 compared to $70,005, a difference of 58.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $82,193, a difference of 57.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $77,929, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $44,763, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $53,732, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 77.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 69.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 51.1%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.1%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 83.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 87.8%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 82.6%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.8%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.4%).