Hungarian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hungarian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hungarians
Chickasaw
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Hungarian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,077,518 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chickasaw.
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $82,193, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $77,929, a difference of 25.2%), and per capita income ($45,426 compared to $36,475, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $53,732, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,426 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,609 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,920 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,795 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,309 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,510 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,247 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,544 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,913 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,673 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.7%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.35%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hungarian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Hungarian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |