Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,223,069 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($91,887 compared to $70,005, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,124 compared to $77,929, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 39.3%), single female poverty (19.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.4%), single father poverty (17.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.38%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.5%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.3%).